Saurabh Garg's Blog

Bose is one of those strange companies that use their brand position almost as much as tangible metrics like product quality to make money. At the same time, they advertise their products so vehemently that you feel like they need to invest in a telemarketing channel.

I decided to buy two Bose products last month as I wanted to see what the hype was all about. After using them for about a month, here’s what I feel:

1. Bose Companion 3 Desktop Speaker System

This is a 2.1 desktop speaker system that I bought from CompUSA. The build is nice and the controls are probably the best I have seen. Now, the sound is a rather unique experience. There is lots and lots of equalization in the sound. It is just so audible. The soundtracks don’t sound like they sound at a theater. Nevertheless, the equalization makes the speakers sound exactly how you would *like* the music to sound at home. The Bose speakers are known to use the “smiley face” equalization technique in almost all their consumer products. What that does is “accentuates the low and high ends to extremely un-natural levels , causes booms, screeches, high end clipping, pronounced “S” when speaking, low end resonant vibrations”. As such, the speakers sound a lot better when placed at a considerable distance from the ears.

The speakers sound great when there’s not a lot of vocal elements in the audio being reproduced. The low freq. bass output is pretty powerful, and the subwoofer houses the main sound processing circuitry of the system. I was astounded when I tried to look in the specifications in the users manual for the total system power output and frequency response, and was unable to find anything. Then, I realized that it was a Bose user’s manual 😉

All in all, I am decently pleased with the system even though there are times when I seriously consider reverting back to my $15 speakers.

2. Bose QuietComfort 2 Noise Cancelling Headphones

As someone else has pointed out, these headphones are $100 worth of headphones, and $200 worth of good noise reduction. I have to say, the noise reduction is spectacular. I used them at a construction site, and all that heavy noise was just reduced to hardly noticeable mumbling. The noise reproduction, on the other hand, is the worst thing these headphones have to offer. Music sounds bland, and vocals are just terrible. Again, these headphones use the same “smiley face” equalization technique that tends to hurt your ears, and could in fact cause temporary loss of high end hearing! These headphones are most definitely going back to the store.

Now, you could say that my opinion was skewed against Bose from the get go, but let me assure you that I am, in fact, loving the desktop speakers. The headphones are great to nullify background noise, but are no better than those $100 headphones you’d buy from any other manufacturer. The triport technology does produce a good low freq response in the form of beats, but all the good is negated by the poor reproduction of vocals; Something which is not easily noticeable in Bose’s desktop and surround speaker systems.

This was surprisingly my first ever product review at this blog!

I was walking down the campus yesterday when I realized that almost 2 out of 3 people on campus had a personal music player of one or the other type. These devices were almost invariably MP3 players the size of one’s palm. Some people had headphones attached to their cellphones or pocket computers, but everyone was listening to some sort of digital media.

This made me wonder. The concet of carrying your music with oneself has really evolved during the last 2-3 decades. In the very beginning, after the birth of portable stereo systems, some youngsters actually carried their stereo systems to listen to their music. Of course, this meant that the devices were bulky and inconvenient to carry, but the fundamental urge to “force” your favorite music down everyone else’s ears superceded the practical issues.

Then came the Sony Walkman in the year 1979. This extremely small pocket sized cassette player is credited with creating a “culture” based around portable music that lives even today. The Walkman was an amazing device. It cost $200 at that time, roughly half the average rent in the city of NY, and could only play back the music, not record it. “Walkmen” ruled the market until mid 90s, when CD sales actually took over cassette sales at a global level. I still remember walking into any electronics store and literally drooling over the multitude of Sony Walkman models, especially the water resistant ones with little digital clocks and FM tuners in them.

The main issue with personal CD players was the size. They were no longer pocket sized, and had to be lugged around in your hand or through some sort of belt clip. Nevertheless, a lot of them were sold just because it is human nature to try to be abreast with the latest and the best. Sony started making huge mistakes around the same time. In their endeavor to be the best electronics company in the world, they started focussing more on proprietary and rather “odd” design schemes instead of adopting the most widely used ones. Actually, Sony has been adept at this ever since they were incorporated (cue debates about the Betamax format), but their strategy isn’t or wasn’t suited for a truly global market where functionality rather than brand value rules the roost.

And then came the age of the MP3 files. Suddenly, the youth was spending more time listening to music downloaded from the Internet than from actually bought CDs. While the industry and record labels (Sony included) were trying their best to curb the free flow of music, Apple came out with the iPod. An iPod was to the personal music market what a Walkman was nearly 2 decades ago. It was exorbitantly priced, played MP3s, and had a massive storage capacity. To take it further, Apple even tied up with various record labels to enable youngsters to purchase music to play on their iPods. Sony was left totally dumbfounded.

Apple had the same advantage that Sony had in 1979. It had a revolutionary product that no one else had, or in fact, seemed to have. Apple took cues from Sony, and not only did it make the iPods functional, but also a fashion statement. Youngsters wanted an iPod for the very same reason they wanted a cassette tape Walkman years ago. Only this time, people had far more disposable income, which translated to a greater market penetration and sales numbers.

I am glad to have joined the revolution last week, although not with an iPod. Truly wonderful times to live in!

I have been using Yahoo! Music Unlimited for a week now. My free 7 day trial ends today, but I think I am going to keep the subscription for some time now. The price is just too hard to give up. I can listen to more than a million soundtracks for $6 a month!

Before subscribing to Yahoo! Music, I had been using Real Rhapsody for more than a year. Rhapsody is a similar music subscription service. Both of them are based on the Windows Media DRM scheme and format, and allow you to stream music on your PC or music device. I am not sure why, but Rhapsody charges extra for the capability to transfer these music files to a portable media device, making their service cost $15 a month.

Price apart, I think both the services are pretty good, but after using Yahoo! for a week, I like how it is actually tied together with the Yahoo! suite of services. It plays well with the messenger service, and shows up as a subscribed service in your Yahoo! account information. The interface is crisp and clear, although a bit slower compared to Rhapsody.

I cannot say much about the music selection, as both the services seemed to offer the newest and the latest albums. As far as Indian music goes, I think Yahoo! offers a better collection, although Rhapsody’s collection was more organized and searcheable. A lot of the music comes from the Saregama label.

I like the personalized radio station too. Basically, it is a radio station based on your taste, and generated by software depending on the ratings given by you to various artists, songs, and albums. Most of the times, I get what I want to hear, and very rarely a song that I do not like.

The Dell DJ interoperation is flawless, and I have to just drag and drop to transfer music to my DJ.

I think Yahoo! has got a good thing going with the Yahoo! Music Engine (basis for the subscription service). If only they could figure out a way to make the Windows DRM available for other platforms, I am sure they could conquer the market with their pricing and personalization.

Interesting blog by a YME developer: Click here!